Law Firm for Entrepreneurs
Copyright Attorney in New York City
Copyright Law
Register, Protect, and Enforce Your Original Work
You created it. Copyright law protects it. But without registration, protection without enforcement is not protection at all.
If you create original work — photographs, written content, designs, illustrations, videos, music, software, or any other creative output — you already have copyright. It attaches automatically the moment your work is created and fixed in a tangible form. No registration required, no © symbol required, no attorney required.
Yet, without a federal copyright registration, you cannot sue for infringement in federal court. You cannot recover statutory damages — which can reach $150,000 per willful infringement. You cannot recover attorney's fees. You face an uphill battle proving ownership in a dispute. And when your content is stolen, repurposed, or used commercially without your permission, your legal tools are dramatically limited.
That is the gap between automatic copyright and registered copyright — and it is a gap that affects tens of thousands of entrepreneurs, creators, and small business owners every day.
Ankhi-Krol Law is a boutique New York City copyright law firm helping creators, entrepreneurs, photographers, fashion designers, beauty brands, content creators, influencers, and small businesses register original work with the US Copyright Office, protect it from infringement, and enforce their rights when violations occur. Attorney Shahrina Ankhi-Krol, Esq. — a nine-time Rising Star Super Lawyer and founder of Ankhi-Krol Law — personally handles every copyright matter with the expertise and personal attention that large firm copyright practices cannot match.
Protect your creative work before someone takes it.
Ankhi-Krol Law provides copyright registration and enforcement for New York entrepreneurs.
What Is Copyright and What Does It Protect?
Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection established by federal law under the Copyright Act of 1976. It grants the creator of an original work a bundle of exclusive legal rights — rights that no other person or entity can exercise without permission.
A valid copyright covers original works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression. In practical terms, copyright protects:
-
Written works — articles, blog posts, website copy, books, scripts, newsletters, marketing materials, and social media captions with original text
-
Photography and digital images — original photographs, whether taken for commercial, editorial, or personal use
-
Visual art and design — original illustrations, graphic designs, logos (the artistic design element), paintings, and digital artwork
-
Video and film content — YouTube videos, reels, short films, branded video content, livestreams, and tutorials
-
Music and audio — original compositions, song lyrics, and recorded performances
-
Software and code — original source code for applications, websites, and programs
-
Fashion and textile designs — original prints, patterns, and surface designs applied to fabric
-
Architectural works — building designs and blueprints
-
Website content — original text, design elements, and photographs displayed on your site
What Copyright Does NOT Protect
The boundary of copyright protection is as important as what falls within it. Copyright does not protect:
-
Ideas, concepts, or facts — only the specific creative expression of those things
-
Names, titles, slogans, or short phrases — these may qualify for trademark protection, not copyright
-
Generic or utilitarian designs — functional elements of clothing, for example, generally do not qualify
-
Works in the public domain — older works whose copyright has expired are freely usable by anyone
-
Government publications — works produced by the US federal government are generally not copyrightable
If your primary concern is protecting a business name, logo used as a brand identifier, or slogan, trademark law is the applicable framework. Copyright protects the creative output; trademark protects the brand identity. Many businesses benefit from both, applied to different elements of their intellectual property.
If you're unsure about what you need, contact Ankhi-Krol Law for a brand review.
Copyright vs. Trademark vs. Patent — At a Glance
Copyright — Protects original creative works: writing, photography, art, music, video, software, design
Trademark — Protects brand identifiers: names, logos, slogans that identify a business's source of goods or services
Patent — Protects inventions, functional designs, processes, and new technologies (not practiced)
Trade Secret — Protects confidential business information maintained in secrecy
Automatic Copyright vs. Registered Copyright: The Difference That Determines Whether You Can Enforce Your Rights
This is the most important concept on this page — and the one most misunderstood by the entrepreneurs, creators, and business owners who need copyright protection most.
What Automatic Copyright Gives You
Under US copyright law, copyright protection attaches automatically the moment an original work is created and fixed in a tangible form. You do not need to register it. You do not need an attorney. The copyright is yours from the instant the work exists in fixed form.
Automatic copyright gives you the legal right to claim ownership of your work — and in theory, the right to prevent others from copying, distributing, displaying, or creating derivative works from it without your permission. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as it sounds as there are grey areas.
What Automatic Copyright Does NOT Give You
Without a federal registration with the US Copyright Office, automatic copyright provides rights that are extremely difficult to enforce in practice:
-
You cannot file a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court without a registration (or a pending registration application). This is a threshold requirement — not a technicality.
-
You cannot recover statutory damages for infringement that occurred before registration. Statutory damages — the most powerful financial remedy available — are only available when the infringed work was registered before the infringement, or within three months of first publication.
-
You cannot recover attorney's fees without a timely registration. In copyright litigation, attorney's fees can far exceed actual damages — making fee recovery a critical litigation tool.
-
You have no public record of ownership. Proving you created the work becomes your burden, fought without the presumptive validity that registration provides.
Critical Timing Requirement
To be eligible for statutory damages and attorney's fees, your copyright must be registered BEFORE the infringement occurs — or within three months of the work's first publication. Waiting until after someone steals your content to register eliminates your most powerful legal remedies. Register first. Enforce later.
What Federal Registration Gives You
A federal copyright registration with the US Copyright Office transforms automatic copyright into legally enforceable rights with full remedial power:
-
Federal court access — Registration is a prerequisite to filing a copyright infringement lawsuit in US federal court. Without it, you cannot sue.
-
Statutory damages — For registered works, courts can award statutory damages of $750 to $30,000 per infringed work — without requiring you to prove your actual financial loss. For willful infringement, statutory damages rise to $150,000 per work.
-
Attorney's fees — The prevailing party in a copyright case can recover attorney's fees for timely-registered works — a powerful deterrent that makes infringers far more likely to settle quickly.
-
Legal presumption of validity — A certificate of registration issued within five years of publication creates a legal presumption that the copyright is valid and that you are the rightful owner. The burden shifts to the infringer to disprove your ownership.
-
Public record — Registration creates a searchable public record of your copyright ownership, which deters infringement and simplifies licensing transactions.
-
US Customs recordation — Registered copyrights can be recorded with US Customs and Border Protection to block the importation of infringing goods — particularly valuable for fashion designers and product-based businesses.
-
Licensing leverage — A registered copyright strengthens your position in licensing negotiations, because licensees can verify your ownership and the scope of your rights in the public record.
Already created something valuable? Register it before someone takes it.
Ankhi-Krol Law handles copyright registration for creators, brands, and businesses.
The Copyright Registration Process: How It Works
Registering a copyright with the US Copyright Office is a more straightforward process than trademark registration — but the details matter, particularly the timing and the type of registration used.
Step 1: Determine What You Are Registering
Copyright registration covers specific works. Before filing, identify exactly what you are registering: a single written work, a collection of photographs, a group of blog posts, a design, a software application, or another category of creative output. The registration type you choose should match the nature of the work.
For creators and businesses with large volumes of content — photographers, bloggers, social media content creators — group registration options can cover multiple works in a single application at a lower per-work cost. Understanding which group registration option applies to your content type is one of the areas where legal guidance adds real value.
Step 2: Prepare the Application
Copyright registration applications are filed through the US Copyright Office's eCO (electronic Copyright Office) system. The application requires identification of the work, the nature of the copyright claimant, the year of creation, the publication status, and the deposit — the actual copy of the work being registered.
Proper deposit submission varies by work type. Literary works are deposited differently from photographs, which are deposited differently from audiovisual works. Errors in deposit submission are among the most common causes of registration complications.
Step 3: Pay the Filing Fee and Submit
US Copyright Office filing fees vary based on the type of application and are subject to change without notice.
Step 4: Processing and Certificate Issuance
The US Copyright Office currently processes online applications in approximately 3 to 6 months for straightforward registrations. Paper applications take significantly longer — often 12 months or more.
Expedited registration is available for an additional fee when time is critical — for example, when infringement is ongoing and you need to file suit quickly.
Once registered, the Copyright Office issues a registration certificate with a registration number and effective date. The effective date of registration is the date the complete application, deposit, and fee were received — not the date the certificate is issued. This means your rights relate back to the date of filing, which is critical for the statutory damages timing analysis.
Copyright Infringement Damages: What's Actually at Stake
The financial consequences of copyright infringement — for both sides — are significant enough that every creator and every business using others' content needs to understand the framework.
Willful infringement can cost up to $150,000 per work.
Attorney's fees are available only for registered works — powerful additional deterrent
For example, a website that republishes ten of your photographs without permission is not facing one statutory damages award. It is facing up to ten. For willful infringement of ten registered photographs, the maximum exposure is $1,500,000.
This is why copyright registration is not optional for any creator, photographer, designer, or content producer who publishes original work publicly and intends to enforce their rights. The difference between an unregistered and a registered copyright is the difference between a claim with limited remedies and a claim with potentially devastating financial consequences for the infringer — which means a registered copyright is a vastly more effective deterrent.
What to Do When Someone Uses Your Work Without Permission
Copyright infringement in the digital age is relentless. Photos are scraped and republished without credit. Written content is copied verbatim and repurposed on competitor sites. Designs are replicated on print-on-demand platforms. Videos are reuploaded to other channels. Discovering that your work has been used without your authorization is frustrating — but it is also a moment where having a registered copyright and qualified legal counsel makes all the difference.
Contact Ankhi-Krol Law if you suspect someone of using your original work without your permission to understand your options.
Step 1: Document the Infringement Thoroughly
Before taking any action, preserve evidence. Screenshot the infringing use, capture the URL, note the date of discovery, record how the content is being used (commercially? on social media? embedded on a website?), and save any metadata visible about the infringing post or page. This documentation is the foundation of any enforcement action and must be created before the infringer removes the content.
Step 2: Assess Your Copyright Status
The first legal question is whether your copyright is registered — and if so, whether the registration predates the infringement or falls within three months of first publication. This determines whether statutory damages and attorney's fees are available, which directly shapes the leverage you have and the remedies you can pursue.
If your work is not yet registered and infringement is ongoing, consult a copyright attorney immediately. In some circumstances, registration can still be completed and litigation initiated — but timing is critical.
Step 3: Understand Your Enforcement Options
It is always advisable to discuss your options with an attorney because your situation may be unique and not fall solely within traditional "boxes."
-
DMCA Takedown Notice — The Digital Millennium Copyright Act provides a formal mechanism for removing infringing content from websites and online platforms without litigation. A properly filed DMCA takedown notice requires the platform hosting the infringing content to remove it promptly or lose its own legal protection. Most major platforms — Google, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Amazon, Etsy, Pinterest, and others — have established DMCA reporting procedures. A qualified copyright attorney ensures takedown notices are properly drafted and submitted to maximize their effectiveness and minimize the risk of counter-notification complications.
-
Cease-and-Desist Letter — A formal written demand from a copyright attorney requiring the infringing party to immediately cease using the work, destroy infringing copies, and potentially compensate the rights holder. A well-crafted cease-and-desist letter identifies the copyrighted work, the registration (if applicable), the nature of the infringement, and the specific demands — including whether a licensing fee is being offered in lieu of litigation. Many infringement matters are resolved at this stage, particularly when the infringer is made aware that the work is registered and statutory damages are in play.
-
Licensing Negotiation — In some cases, the appropriate resolution is not litigation but a retroactive or prospective licensing agreement. If the infringing party has used your work in a way that could continue with your permission and compensation, a licensing arrangement may be a commercially rational outcome for both sides. Ankhi-Krol Law can negotiate licensing terms that compensate you appropriately for the use.
-
Federal Court Litigation — For serious, commercial-scale, or willful infringement — particularly where the infringing party has ignored cease-and-desist demands or the financial stakes justify it — copyright litigation in federal court is the most powerful enforcement tool available. Copyright cases are filed in federal district court. In New York City, that means the Southern District of New York (SDNY), which handles some of the most significant copyright cases in the country. Available remedies include injunctions, impoundment and destruction of infringing materials, statutory damages up to $150,000 per willful infringement, and attorney's fees.
Work Made for Hire: The Copyright Ownership Question Every
Entrepreneur Gets Wrong
Of all the copyright concepts that create recurring legal problems for entrepreneurs, work made for hire is the most consequential — and the most misunderstood.
Here is the default rule: copyright in a work belongs to the person who created it. The photographer who takes your product photos owns the copyright in those photos. The graphic designer who creates your logo owns the copyright in that design. The writer who produces your website copy owns the copyright in that text. You paid for the work, but you do not own the copyright — unless a written agreement says otherwise.
If you need a contract that clearly spells out the ownership rights of the intellectual property involved, be sure to contact Ankhi-Krol Law for customized binding contracts.
When Does Work Made for Hire Apply?
Under Section 101 of the Copyright Act, a work qualifies as made for hire in two circumstances:
1. Works created by employees within the scope of employment — When an employee creates copyrightable work as part of their job, the employer owns the copyright. This applies automatically without any written agreement.
2. Works specially commissioned under a written agreement — For independent contractors, a work can only qualify as work made for hire if: (a) it falls into one of nine specific statutory categories listed in the Copyright Act, AND (b) the parties expressly agree in a written, signed contract that the work is a work made for hire.
The nine statutory categories for commissioned works include: contributions to collective works, parts of motion pictures or audiovisual works, translations, supplementary works, compilations, instructional texts, tests, answer material for tests, and atlases. Notably absent from this list: general graphic design, software code, photography, and most written content — categories that represent the vast majority of commissioned work that entrepreneurs actually pay for.
The Most Common Copyright Mistake Entrepreneurs Make
Paying a freelance designer, photographer, or developer for creative work and assuming you own the copyright because you paid for it. Without a written agreement explicitly assigning the copyright to you, the creator owns it. This means they can resell it, reuse it, or prevent you from using it as you intended. Every contract with a creative contractor should include either a work-for-hire clause (where applicable) or a copyright assignment clause.
IP Assignment vs. Work Made for Hire: Which Do You Need?
When the work being commissioned does not fall into one of the nine statutory work-made-for-hire categories, the correct legal mechanism is a copyright assignment — a written transfer of all copyright rights from the creator to the client. An assignment is distinct from work made for hire but achieves the same practical result: the business owns the copyright in the commissioned work.
Ankhi-Krol Law regularly drafts independent contractor agreements, creative services agreements, and work-for-hire clauses that properly address copyright ownership — protecting clients from discovering years later that the website they paid to build, the photographs they used in a campaign, or the logo that defines their brand are legally owned by someone else.
Copyright Licensing: Getting Paid for How Others Use Your Work
A copyright is not only a shield against infringement — it is a revenue-generating asset. Licensing is the mechanism by which copyright owners grant others the right to use their work under defined conditions, in exchange for compensation.
Types of Copyright Licenses
Exclusive License — Grants one specific licensee the sole right to use the work in a defined way — often for a specific territory, medium, or time period. The copyright owner retains ownership but cannot grant the same rights to anyone else during the license term. Exclusive licenses must be in writing to be valid.
Non-Exclusive License — Grants a licensee permission to use the work, while the copyright owner retains the right to grant the same permission to others. Most stock photography and content licensing arrangements are non-exclusive.
Synchronization License — Required to use music in timed relation to visual content — in a video, film, advertisement, or social media post. Sync licenses are a common source of legal exposure for content creators who use popular music in their videos without proper authorization.
Print License — Governs the use of photographs, illustrations, or other visual works in printed materials such as books, magazines, packaging, or marketing collateral.
Limited License — Restricts how the work can be used — specifying the medium, territory, number of copies, time period, or purpose. Brand licensing, influencer content agreements, and stock photo purchases often operate as limited licenses.
If you have questions about any of these documents, be sure to contact Ankhi-Krol Law.
Why Licensing Agreements Must Be in Writing
Licensing arrangements — whether you are the licensor granting rights or the licensee receiving them — must be carefully documented. The terms that matter most: the scope of the license (what specific rights are granted), the territory (where the work can be used), the exclusivity status, the duration, the compensation structure, the quality control provisions, and the termination rights.
For small businesses and creators, informal licensing arrangements — a social media DM giving someone permission to repost your photo, a verbal agreement with a brand to use your content — create significant risk. Disputes about what was actually agreed to, who has rights to what, and whether compensation is owed are almost entirely avoidable with a written license agreement.
If you need to review a contract or draft a customized agreement, contact us.
Fair Use: What It Is, What It Is Not, and Why It Is Not a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card
Fair use is among the most frequently cited and least understood concepts in copyright law. It is invoked constantly — by content creators using copyrighted music in videos, by social media users reposting photographs, by websites reproducing articles — often incorrectly, and often by parties who would lose a fair use analysis if one were actually applied by a court.
Fair use is a legal defense, not a right. It allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission under specific circumstances, evaluated through a four-factor test that courts apply case by case. There is no bright-line rule. No magic word count, clip length, or percentage of a work that automatically qualifies as fair use.
Common Fair Use Myths — Corrected
-
Myth: Adding a credit line ('credit to original creator') makes use of a photo fair use. Reality: Attribution does not establish fair use. Permission does.
-
Myth: Using less than 30 seconds of a song is always fair use. Reality: There is no minimum time threshold for fair use of music. Even brief clips can infringe.
-
Myth: If content is publicly posted on social media, anyone can repost it. Reality: Publicly posted content is not public domain. The creator retains copyright.
-
Myth: Non-commercial use is always fair use. Reality: Non-commercial purpose is one favorable factor, not a complete defense. Courts evaluate all four factors together.
-
Myth: Transforming a photo (applying a filter, cropping, adding text) makes it original. Reality: A derivative work still requires permission from the original copyright owner.
If you have questions about fair use, let us know.
Copyright Law for Creative Industries:
Industry-Specific Expertise That Changes the Advice
Ankhi-Krol Law serves clients across multiple creative industries — and the copyright questions that arise in fashion look different from those that arise in the pet industry, which look different from those that arise in the influencer economy. Generic copyright advice misses these distinctions. Industry-specific legal counsel accounts for them.
Copyright for Fashion Designers and Apparel Brands
Fashion design occupies a uniquely complicated position in US copyright law. The Copyright Act's useful articles doctrine has historically limited protection for clothing designs, because clothing serves a utilitarian function — and purely functional elements of a useful article are not copyrightable.
The Supreme Court's 2017 decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. clarified the test: a design element on a useful article (like a garment) is copyrightable if the artistic element can be identified separately from, and would qualify for copyright protection on its own apart from, the functional article.
In practical terms for New York fashion brands: the overall cut and silhouette of a garment typically cannot be copyrighted. But original prints, embroidery designs, textile patterns, and surface decorations applied to fabric can qualify for copyright protection as standalone artistic works. Original photographs used in look-books, editorial spreads, and marketing campaigns are separately copyrightable. Website copy, brand stories, and original written content are copyrightable.
Ankhi-Krol Law advises fashion designers and apparel brands on which elements of their creative output are protectable, how to register those protections efficiently, and how to enforce them when fast-fashion imitators or competitors cross the line.
Copyright for Photographers and Visual Artists
Photographers are among the most systematically infringed creators in the digital economy. Images are scraped from websites, reposted to social media without credit, used in commercial campaigns without licensing, and incorporated into products without authorization — at a scale that has become normalized, even though it is legally actionable.
Every original photograph is copyrightable from the moment of capture. The question for photographers who want to be able to enforce those rights is registration — and specifically, the timing and method of registration that maximizes legal protection across a large body of work.
The US Copyright Office offers group registration options for photographs that can cover up to 750 published images in a single application at a modest filing fee. For working photographers who produce large volumes of commercial, editorial, or event photography, a systematic registration practice — ideally registering each new body of work within three months of publication — is the foundation of an enforceable copyright portfolio.
Ankhi-Krol Law advises photographers on registration strategy, licensing terms for commercial use of their work, and enforcement when images appear without authorization.
Copyright for Content Creators, Influencers, Creatives,
and Social Media Professionals
The creator economy has produced a new class of intellectual property — original social media content — that the copyright framework was not originally designed to address. But the framework applies nonetheless, and creators who understand it have powerful legal tools that most of their peers do not use.
Original photographs, original video content, original written captions with creative expression, original audio recordings, and original graphics posted to Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, or any other platform are copyrightable works. The fact that they are published on a social media platform does not place them in the public domain. It does not give other users the right to download and repost them. It does not give brands the right to repurpose them in advertising without a license.
The landmark case Gifford v. Sheil — in which one influencer sued another for copying the aesthetic and composition of her social media posts — is actively pending in federal court as of 2025 and signals a new era of copyright enforcement in the creator economy. Gifford was able to bring the case because she had registered hundreds of her photographs with the Copyright Office. That registration made the difference between having a federal copyright claim and not having one.
Ankhi-Krol Law advises content creators and influencers on copyright registration for social media content, DMCA takedowns when content is reposted without permission, and the intellectual property ownership provisions in brand deal and sponsorship contracts.
Copyright for Beauty Brands and Cosmetics Businesses
Beauty brands generate substantial original creative content — product photography, tutorial videos, written formulation descriptions, brand storytelling, packaging design, and educational content — all of which are copyrightable assets. For beauty entrepreneurs who invest significantly in visual identity and content production, copyright registration is a practical protection for real business assets.
A particular concern for beauty brands in the digital environment: unauthorized repurposing of product photographs and tutorial content. A competitor using your product images to sell their products, or a third-party platform embedding your tutorial content to drive their traffic, creates both reputational and commercial harm. A registered copyright gives you the legal tools to stop it.
Copyright for the Pet Industry
Pet industry entrepreneurs produce original content — training guides, care tutorials, grooming educational videos, original photography, and written materials — that build their reputation and drive their business. These materials are original works of authorship, fully protectable under copyright law.
For pet industry professionals who speak at conferences, publish educational resources, or produce branded content, copyright registration is the mechanism that ensures their original work cannot be reproduced and redistributed by others without authorization. Ankhi-Krol Law brings documented expertise in the pet industry community — from Barkleigh to IBPSA to PSI — that makes the legal guidance practical and industry-grounded rather than abstract.
Your creative work is worth protecting — regardless of the industry you work in.
Ankhi-Krol Law brings copyright expertise and industry knowledge most firms simply do not have.
The DMCA: How Online Copyright Enforcement Actually Works
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is the federal law that governs copyright enforcement in the online environment. It is the mechanism that makes it possible for creators to remove stolen content from the internet without filing a lawsuit — and it is one of the most powerful tools available to a copyright owner whose work has been posted online without authorization.
How DMCA Takedown Notices Work
The DMCA's safe harbor provisions protect online platforms — websites, hosting companies, social media networks, search engines — from copyright infringement liability for user-posted content, provided they comply with a notice-and-takedown process. When a copyright owner properly notifies a platform of infringement, the platform must expeditiously remove the infringing content or lose its safe harbor protection.
A valid DMCA takedown notice must include: identification of the copyrighted work claimed to be infringed, identification of the infringing material and its location, contact information for the copyright owner, a statement of good faith belief that the use is unauthorized, a statement under penalty of perjury that the information is accurate and the notifying party is authorized to act, and the physical or electronic signature of the copyright owner or authorized agent.
Improperly filed DMCA notices — whether deficient in content or filed against uses that may qualify as fair use — can expose the filer to liability for knowing material misrepresentation. This is one of the reasons that DMCA enforcement benefits from qualified legal counsel, particularly in contexts where fair use arguments may be available to the alleged infringer.
Counter-Notification and the Platform's Response
An alleged infringer who believes a takedown notice was improper may file a counter-notification with the platform. If a valid counter-notification is filed, the platform may restore the removed content after 10 to 14 business days unless the copyright owner files a court action seeking to restrain the restoration. This creates a choice point: accept the content's restoration, or proceed to litigation.
Managing the DMCA process — particularly when counter-notifications are filed — requires legal strategy. Ankhi-Krol Law advises copyright owners through every stage of the online enforcement process.
Why Creators and Entrepreneurs Choose Ankhi-Krol Law
for Copyright Representation
There are copyright attorneys in New York City who specialize in entertainment law — major label disputes, film licensing, publishing contracts. There are large IP firms that handle copyright as one of twenty practice areas. And there are generalists who cover copyright basics adequately.
None of them are Ankhi-Krol Law — and the difference is specific:
Nine-Time Rising Star Super Lawyer — Attorney Shahrina Ankhi-Krol has been recognized as a Rising Star Super Lawyer for eight consecutive years. Fewer than 2.5% of New York State attorneys receive this recognition each year. It is peer-validated, independently verified excellence — not a self-selected designation.
Industry expertise that is real, not marketed — Fashion designers, beauty entrepreneurs, content creators, influencers, photographers, pet industry professionals. These are not footnotes in Ankhi-Krol Law's practice — they are the clients this firm has served for over a decade. The copyright advice is better because the industry knowledge is genuine.
Personal attorney attention on every matter — At Ankhi-Krol Law, Ms. Ankhi-Krol handles your copyright matter personally. You are not passed to an associate. Your registration, your DMCA takedown, your licensing agreement — your attorney, start to finish.
Boutique practice, practical pricing — Flat-fee and transparent pricing structures for copyright registration and defined-scope matters. Entrepreneurs get clear costs upfront rather than open-ended hourly billing.
The trademark-copyright connection — Many clients of Ankhi-Krol Law need both copyright and trademark protection for different elements of their intellectual property. Working with one attorney who handles both — and understands how they interact — produces more comprehensive brand protection than splitting the work between two firms.
Over a decade of New York City copyright experience — Since 2012, Ankhi-Krol Law has helped entrepreneurs, creators, and small business owners across New York and the United States protect and enforce their original work.
Frequently Asked Questions — Copyright Attorney New York City
Do I need to register my copyright to be protected?
Technically, no. Copyright protection in the United States is automatic from the moment an original work is created and fixed in a tangible form.
However, registration with the US Copyright Office is required before you can file a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court, and registration before infringement occurs (or within three months of first publication) is required to be eligible for statutory damages and attorney's fees. Practical copyright enforcement depends on registration. Without it, your rights are real but extremely difficult to enforce.
How much does copyright registration cost?
US Copyright Office filing fees vary based on the type of application and are subject to change without notice.
Attorney fees for copyright registration services vary based on the scope and complexity of the work being registered. Ankhi-Krol Law offers flat-fee copyright services — contact us to discuss the cost for your specific situation.
How long does copyright protection last?
For works created on or after January 1, 1978, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. For works created under a work-made-for-hire arrangement, or for anonymous or pseudonymous works, copyright lasts for 95 years from the date of publication or 120 years from the date of creation, whichever is shorter. Works in the public domain — whose copyright has expired or was never valid — can be freely used by anyone. Just be careful of what you may think belongs in the public domain as they may actually be protected works.
Copyright duration rules have changed multiple times over US legal history, and determining whether a specific older work is protected requires careful analysis.
Someone posted my photo online without permission. What can I do?
If your photograph is registered with the US Copyright Office — or was registered within three months of first publication — you have strong legal options: a DMCA takedown notice to have the content removed from the platform, a cease-and-desist letter demanding removal and potential compensation, a licensing demand for retroactive use fees, and potentially federal court litigation seeking statutory damages and attorney's fees. If your photograph is not yet registered, you will likely have less options.
Consult with Ankhi-Krol Law about your options before taking further action.
I paid a freelancer to design my logo. Do I own the copyright?
Not automatically. Under US copyright law, the creator of a work — including a freelance designer — owns the copyright in that work by default, even if you paid them to create it. For you to own the copyright, either the work must qualify as 'work made for hire' under a written agreement (which has specific legal requirements), or the designer must execute a written copyright assignment transferring all rights to you. Many entrepreneurs discover years after the fact that they do not own the copyright in their logo, website, or other commissioned creative work because no assignment was ever documented. If you have engaged creative contractors without copyright assignment language in your agreements, this is worth reviewing with a copyright attorney.
Ankhi-Krol Law drafts and reviews various types of intellectual property law related contracts and would be happy to help.
What is a DMCA takedown notice and how do I file one?
A DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) takedown notice is a formal notification to an online platform — a website, social media network, search engine, or hosting provider — that content it is hosting infringes your copyright. When properly filed, the platform must expeditiously remove the infringing content or risk losing its legal protection. Filing a DMCA takedown requires a specific set of information including identification of the infringed work, identification of the infringing content, contact information, and statements made under penalty of perjury. An improperly filed or bad-faith takedown notice can expose the filer to liability.
Ankhi-Krol Law drafts and files DMCA notices for copyright owners and advises on counter-notifications when takedown notices are received.
Can I use someone else's content if I credit them?
No — attribution is not a license. Crediting the original creator does not give you the right to use their copyrighted work without permission. Copyright law grants the owner exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, display, and create derivative works from their original work. Using someone's photograph, article, video, or other copyrighted content without a license, written permission, or a defensible fair use basis is infringement — regardless of whether you include a credit. If you want to use someone else's content, you need their permission, a license, or a specific legal basis for doing so...otherwise, you are at a risk of being sued.
What is the difference between copyright and trademark for a logo?
A logo can potentially benefit from both copyright and trademark protection, applied through separate legal systems that protect different aspects of the same asset. Copyright protects the artistic design of the logo — the original creative expression in the graphic, illustration, or stylized text. Trademark protects the logo as a brand identifier — the visual mark that consumers associate with the source of your goods or services. Copyright registration is filed with the US Copyright Office; trademark registration is filed with the USPTO. Both registrations are advisable for logos that have significant brand value, and they are complementary protections that together provide more comprehensive coverage than either alone.
Ankhi-Krol Law provides comprehensive review of your brand portfolio to advise you on the best ways to protect your brand — whether it's through trademark, copyright, or both.
Is social media content copyrighted?
Yes — original content posted to social media platforms is copyrighted by its creator from the moment of creation and posting. Instagram posts, TikTok videos, YouTube videos, Pinterest images, Twitter/X posts with original written content, and other social media content are original works of authorship protected by copyright.
The fact that content is publicly viewable on a platform does not make it public domain. It does not give other users the right to download, repost, or commercially use it without permission. Platform terms of service may grant the platform certain rights to display and distribute content — but they do not transfer ownership from the creator, and they do not authorize other users to copy and repurpose the content.
What is fair use and does it protect my use of copyrighted material?
Fair use is a legal defense that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission under specific circumstances — evaluated through a four-factor test that courts apply case by case. The four factors are: the purpose and character of the use (is it transformative?), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used relative to the whole, and the effect on the market for the original.
Fair use is not a right — it is a defense that a court evaluates after the fact. There is no automatic rule (no time limit, word count, or percentage) that guarantees fair use. Relying on fair use as a strategy carries significant legal risk. If your use of copyrighted material has commercial purposes, does not transform the original, and could harm its market, it is unlikely to qualify as fair use regardless of how small the portion used.
Can Ankhi-Krol Law help if I receive a copyright infringement claim?
Yes. Receiving a cease-and-desist letter, a DMCA counter-notification, or a notice of copyright infringement claim requires prompt attention. The way you respond — and the timing of your response — can significantly affect your legal exposure. Ankhi-Krol Law advises businesses and individuals all over the country on copyright infringement claims, evaluates the validity of the claim, assesses available defenses including fair use, and negotiates resolutions that protect the client's interests.
Protect Your Original Work.
Start With a Copyright Consultation.
Every day your original work exists without a copyright registration is a day your legal protection is limited to rights you cannot practically enforce. Photographers, designers, writers, influencers, brands, and entrepreneurs across New York City and the United States are discovering — often in the middle of an infringement crisis — that automatic copyright without registration is not enough.
Ankhi-Krol Law works with creators and entrepreneurs to register original work, draft and enforce licensing agreements, file DMCA takedowns, and respond to infringement claims — with the industry-specific knowledge and personal attorney attention that the work deserves.
Quick Links
As seen on
